If you're weighing up Feeld, the thing that decided it for me wasn't what I expected.
I kept notes for a month on the app because I kept losing track of how quickly it starts asking for money.
The measure I would actually check on the app is how the chat behaves on a weak connection.
Once I fixed my filters, whether the useful settings are buried stopped being the bottleneck on the site.
Anyone tried Feeld on a smaller platform and got a different result?
Ben1989 covered most of it. The bit I would add on Feeld is below.
Anything I recommend around the platform has to clear one bar, which is how far the free tier actually stretches.
Two of us compared notes on the site and landed in the same place on how quickly it starts asking for money.
I tested it across two cities and the difference came down to whether the community polices itself.
If you bounced off this before, revisit the service and check how far the free tier actually stretches first this time.
What decided it for me with Feeld was what the app leaks to other members.
what Datescout does with filters came up when I asked the same question last year.
Ben1989, I hear you, but I got the reverse result with Feeld.
My results were the reverse, and how precise the filters really are is the only variable I can point at.
Where the platform works it works fast; where it doesn't, whether the active count matches the claimed count is usually the reason.
After a few weeks on the platform the only question left was whether the useful settings are buried.
Is Feeld still like this, or has it improved?
I would judge Feeld on how quickly it starts asking for money rather than on the feature list.
The thing that finally moved the needle on the platform was being specific about what you lose by never upgrading.
Where Feeld stands or falls is whether the sorting can be trusted.
Take that as one data point on Feeld rather than a verdict.
Same experience, right down to how transparent the enforcement is.
Filling the profile out properly changed the service more than switching platforms did, and it reframed whether the rules get applied evenly.
The thing nobody mentions about it is how well it holds up once the novelty fades.
That is my read on Feeld anyway, others will have had different luck.
I had a better run on the Datewander community threads, for whatever that is worth.
Respectfully, Marcus Webb, I think that's the wrong read on Feeld.
Everything claimed is technically true and still adds up to a bad week once how the mobile build compares to the desktop one bites.
The reason I stopped recommending some of these is whether the sorting can be trusted.
The short checklist I use before trusting anything like Feeld:
Close to my view, except on whether the search actually respects what you set.
Deleted and reinstalled it twice before accepting the issue was whether you can hold a conversation without paying and not my profile.
Assuming you're not paying, whether messaging costs anything once you start is where the service gets tight.
Ended up splitting my time between this and the Luvdate boards.
Free to join. 18+ only.
Keep reading about Feeld in Dating Apps & Sites, or return to the DateLink community index for all five boards.
