Does anyone know what happened to the camsoda c9m feature?

Agree with Tyler_B, though Camsoda was a bit worse in my case.

Where Camsoda stands or falls is how much control you get over who sees you.

Gave that one a fair run over 3 weeks and kept coming back to how the mobile build compares to the desktop one.

Anyone tried Camsoda on a smaller platform and got a different result?

Seconding what Rachel_88 said, with one caveat about Camsoda.

My first week on Camsoda looked promising; by the second I was only really watching how much control you get over who sees you.

If you bounced off this before, revisit that one and check whether the interface gets in the way first this time.

The measure I would actually check on Camsoda is what protection exists before you meet.

Turning off read receipts made the room far less stressful, though it did nothing for whether the useful settings are buried.

The short checklist I use before trusting anything like Camsoda:

• How much of Camsoda is visible before it asks you to register
• Whether the Camsoda match count moves when you widen the radius
• Whether Camsoda works at all outside the three biggest cities near you
• Whether Camsoda shows you who has actually read a message

Someone in another thread pointed me at Turndate for this exact use case and it was a fair shout.

Worth flagging whether the useful settings are buried before anyone commits to the platform.

If your area is thin, the room will not fix that, whatever how precise the filters really are looks like.

I would judge Camsoda on whether bans stick or get walked back rather than on the feature list.

That is my read on Camsoda anyway, others will have had different luck.

Roughly my read too, with whether the free version is a demo or a product as the caveat.

The thing nobody mentions about Camsoda is whether the safety tooling is more than a checkbox.

Once I fixed my filters, how the chat behaves on a weak connection stopped being the bottleneck on that one.

After a few weeks on Camsoda the only question left was whether the interface gets in the way.

Two of us compared notes on that one and landed in the same place on whether the algorithm is doing anything useful.

Whatever you land on, test Camsoda for a week before you judge it.

If this one does not work out, DatingFly, which came up earlier covers similar ground.

Not sure I agree with Tyler_B. On Camsoda the opposite was true in my area.

The good behaviour lasted right until the trial ended, and then how the mobile build compares to the desktop one changed.

Filling the profile out properly changed that one more than switching platforms did, and it reframed how usable it's one-handed on a phone.

Anything I recommend around it has to clear one bar, which is whether the free version is a demo or a product.

Tyler_B is right about this and I would go a step further on Camsoda.

What separates Camsoda from the rest of the field is whether the algorithm is doing anything useful.

Ran it alongside two other options for a month, tracking how precise the filters really are.

Jessica Park, I hear you, but I got the reverse result with Camsoda.

I got the enforcement described exactly once. After that, how usable it is one-handed on a phone went back to being a problem.

I kept notes for a month on the platform because I kept losing track of how usable it's one-handed on a phone.

If this one does not work out, luvdate.site covers similar ground.