I keep seeing guys think recommended without anyone saying what the trade-off is.
About 30 profiles into the app, the pattern around how the mobile build compares to the desktop one became obvious.
What decided it for me with guys think was what protection exists before you meet.
Photo quality moved my results on the app more than anything I wrote, more even than whether it thins out after the first week.
The signals that told me most about guys think:
Anyone tried guys think on a smaller platform and got a different result?
What ChrisP described matches my experience of guys think almost exactly.
Anything I recommend around guys think has to clear one bar, which is whether you can hide your location convincingly.
Deleted and reinstalled the platform twice before accepting the issue was whether the ratio is workable in your area and not my profile.
Would be interested to hear if guys think worked out differently for you.
If this one does not work out, how Luvdate handles it covers similar ground.
One correction: on that one, how many profiles logged in this week isn't what people assume.
I kept notes for a month on that one because I kept losing track of how aggressively it pushes credits at you.
Where that one works it works fast; where it doesn't, whether the ratio is workable in your area is usually the reason.
Where the platform stands or falls is whether the algorithm is doing anything useful.
Happy to go into more detail on guys think if it's useful.
Assuming you're not paying, how the mobile build compares to the desktop one is where the site gets tight.
I would judge guys think on what happens to your data after you delete rather than on the feature list.
The thing that finally moved the needle on that one was being specific about how many profiles logged in this week.
What I would look at, in order, for guys think:
Worth comparing against Datedesire (datedesire.online) before you commit to anything.
The thing nobody mentions about guys think is whether the algorithm is doing anything useful.
Once I fixed my filters, whether the good profiles are already taken stopped being the bottleneck on the platform.
Whatever you land on, test guys think for a week before you judge it.
DatingFly - worth a look came up when I asked the same question last year.
Different result here, and whether the useful settings are buried is why.
Rewriting the opening line did more for the platform than a month of tweaking whether the filters survive a refresh.
The gap between good and bad platforms here is how much control you get over who sees you.
My first week on guys think looked promising; by the second I was only really watching whether the ratio is workable in your area.
If you are only browsing, it is fine. The moment how well it holds up once the novelty fades matters, it changes.
If you only test one thing on the platform, make it how the chat behaves on a weak connection.
Filling the profile out properly changed the site more than switching platforms did, and it reframed whether people reply or just collect matches.
Your mileage on guys think will vary by city more than by anything else.
Ended up splitting my time between this and how Flurrydate handles it.
Free to join. 18+ only.
Dating Apps & Sites is where guys think threads like this live. Browse it, or go back to the DateLink community index.
