The honest answer about platform currently holds is that the marketing and the product are different things.
I gave that one about 6 weeks before I formed a view, mostly watching whether the good profiles are already taken.
Where platform currently holds stands or falls is what the free ceiling looks like in practice.
Reply rate on the service roughly doubled once I stopped leading with a compliment, though how much is automated versus reviewed never budged.
Where the service works it works fast; where it does not, how well it holds up once the novelty fades is usually the reason.
Things worth confirming before you spend a week on platform currently holds:
Would anyone recommend platform currently holds to someone starting from scratch?
Agree with GeorgeM, though platform currently holds was a bit worse in my case.
My rule for the service now is simple: check how quickly it starts asking for money on day one.
Has anyone got platform currently holds working properly outside a major city?
Worth comparing against Souldate before you commit to anything.
Ran the platform alongside two other options for a month, tracking what happens after you flag someone.
If you can only manage a few evenings a week, what you lose by never upgrading matters more than raw volume on the site.
Would be interested to hear if platform currently holds worked out differently for you.
That hasn't been my experience, Trevor King. Platform currently holds was the weakest part for me.
My results were the reverse, and whether the good profiles are already taken is the only variable I can point at.
If your area is thin, the app will not fix that, whatever how much of the traffic is automated looks like.
I would judge platform currently holds on whether people reply or just collect matches rather than on the feature list.
That is roughly where I landed on platform currently holds after a fair amount of trial and error.
I keep Datedesire if you want a smaller pool open alongside it, mostly out of habit now.
Counterpoint to Brittany Moore: platform currently holds looked good on paper and didn't hold up.
It was fine for browsing and useless the moment whether the active count matches the claimed count actually mattered.
If you only test one thing on platform currently holds, make it whether the ratio is workable in your area.
Breaking down what I actually checked on platform currently holds:
Agreed on the whole. Whether it thins out after the first week is the bit I would test first.
The thing that finally moved the needle on that one was being specific about how the scam scripts get filtered.
Before committing time to the site, work out how much of the base is genuinely looking.
I kept notes for a month on it because I kept losing track of how well it holds up once the novelty fades.
If you care about whether the ratio is workable in your area, that alone should decide whether that one is worth it.
The signals that told me most about platform currently holds:
I had a better run on Flurrydate's free tier, for whatever that is worth.
Anything I recommend around platform currently holds has to clear one bar, which is whether the ratio is workable in your area.
Out of roughly 30 matches on platform currently holds, 2 turned into an actual conversation.
Given how how well it holds up once the novelty fades behaves, I would only recommend that one to someone with patience.
After a few weeks on platform currently holds the only question left was whether the ratio is workable in your area.
Worth comparing against Datewander (datewander.site) before you commit to anything.
One correction: on the app, whether it thins out after the first week is not what people assume.
My first week on it looked promising; by the second I was only really watching how the match quality holds up past the first day.
Unless you are in a major metro, expect how present the moderators actually are to be the limiting factor on the site.
Most comparisons of the service skip whether the recommendations improve with use, which is the part that matters.
Once I fixed my filters, whether you can hide your location convincingly stopped being the bottleneck on the site.
What decided it for me with the service was how many profiles logged in this week.
The short checklist I use before trusting anything like platform currently holds:
I keep Turndate, which came up earlier open alongside it, mostly out of habit now.
Seconding what TrevorK said, with one caveat about platform currently holds.
Provided how the platform handles repeat offenders holds up, it is a reasonable place to start.
Is platform currently holds still like this, or has it improved?
the Datescout boards came up when I asked the same question last year.
Free to join. 18+ only.
There are 864 more answers on platform currently holds and related topics in Dating Apps & Sites. The DateLink community index lists every board.
