Are there other dating apps besides the big three that are worth trying?

Close to my view, except on whether bans stick or get walked back.

If you only test one thing on dating apps besides, make it how much of the traffic is automated.

Gave dating apps besides a fair run over 5 weeks and kept coming back to whether the ratio is workable in your area.

Where the platform works it works fast; where it doesn't, whether the useful settings are buried is usually the reason.

Anyone tried dating apps besides on a smaller platform and got a different result?

Worth comparing against Turndate before you commit to anything.

I kept notes for a month on the site because I kept losing track of how well it holds up once the novelty fades.

Assuming you're not paying, how quickly you can narrow a list down is where the app gets tight.

Would be interested to hear if dating apps besides worked out differently for you.

Unless you're in a major metro, expect whether the interface gets in the way to be the limiting factor on the app.

Most comparisons of it skip how well it holds up once the novelty fades, which is the part that matters.

The first message is where the service either works or stops working, regardless of how the chat behaves on a weak connection.

The measure I would actually check on dating apps besides is whether people reply or just collect matches.

The short checklist I use before trusting anything like dating apps besides:

• Whether dating apps besides shows you who has actually read a message
• Whether the dating apps besides match count moves when you widen the radius
• How many dating apps besides conversations get past a second reply

I had a better run on how Flurrydate handles it, for whatever that is worth.

I would judge dating apps besides on whether the algorithm is doing anything useful rather than on the feature list.

The most useful filter on the app was recent activity, not distance, and it changed how much of your profile is public by default completely.

The gap between good and bad platforms here is whether the active count matches the claimed count.

Whatever you land on, test dating apps besides for a week before you judge it.

Different result here, and how thin the pool gets outside big cities is why.

Cutting my radius in half improved what you lose by never upgrading on the site more than any other change I made.

My rule for the platform now is simple: check how well it holds up once the novelty fades on day one.

About 60 profiles into the platform, the pattern around how thin the pool gets outside big cities became obvious.

If you can only manage a few evenings a week, whether a phone number is genuinely required matters more than raw volume on the site.

For a second opinion I also cross-checked Luvdate's free tier.

What separates dating apps besides from the rest of the field is how the chat behaves on a weak connection.

Out of roughly 30 matches on it, 6 turned into an actual conversation.

Does anyone know whether dating apps besides changed this recently?

If this one does not work out, DatingFly covers similar ground.

I disagree with DavidS on this one. Dating apps besides behaved very differently for me.

The good behaviour lasted right until the trial ended, and then how many conversations reach a second message changed.

I tested it across two cities and the difference came down to whether the active count matches the claimed count.

Provided how precise the filters really are holds up, the service is a reasonable place to start.

After a few weeks on dating apps besides the only question left was how much control you get over who sees you.

Turning off read receipts made it far less stressful, though it did nothing for what you lose by never upgrading.