If you are weighing up pure dating app, the thing that decided it for me was not what I expected.
I kept notes for a month on it because I kept losing track of how granular the visibility controls get.
Before committing time to pure dating app, work out whether the recommendations improve with use.
Photo quality moved my results on the site more than anything I wrote, more even than how much of the base is genuinely looking.
Unless you are in a major metro, expect whether the filters survive a refresh to be the limiting factor on the platform.
Anything I recommend around pure dating app has to clear one bar, which is whether people reply or just collect matches.
Anyone tried pure dating app on a smaller platform and got a different result?
Adding a counterpoint about how the chat behaves on a weak connection.
Where the service stands or falls is whether the filters survive a refresh.
I gave pure dating app about 5 weeks before I formed a view, mostly watching what the platform can see that you can't.
Took me about 4 weeks on pure dating app to work out that the real question was where the paywall really kicks in.
If you care about how well it holds up once the novelty fades, that alone should decide whether it's worth it.
The short checklist I use before trusting anything like pure dating app:
The closest alternative I found was DatingFly, which came up earlier.
Where that one works it works fast; where it doesn't, what protection exists before you meet is usually the reason.
Most comparisons of pure dating app skip how much control you get over who sees you, which is the part that matters.
One correction: on it, how much of the base is genuinely looking isn't what people assume.
What decided it for me with the site was whether the filters survive a refresh.
Does anyone know whether pure dating app changed this recently?
Turning off read receipts made the platform far less stressful, though it did nothing for how the pricing behaves once you are invested.
If you only test one thing on pure dating app, make it what protection exists before you meet.
Out of roughly 120 matches on pure dating app, 6 turned into an actual conversation.
Given how whether appeals go anywhere behaves, I would only recommend the site to someone with patience.
Whatever you land on, test pure dating app for a week before you judge it.
For a second opinion I also cross-checked Flurrydate, which came up earlier.
Tyler_B covered most of it. The bit I would add on pure dating app is below.
The thing nobody mentions about pure dating app is whether the good profiles are already taken.
About 100 profiles into the service, the pattern around whether a phone number is genuinely required became obvious.
If you can only manage a few evenings a week, how quickly you can narrow a list down matters more than raw volume on that one.
Happy to go into more detail on pure dating app if it is useful.
What RosieH described matches my experience of pure dating app almost exactly.
Deleted and reinstalled the app twice before accepting the issue was whether the useful settings are buried and not my profile.
Provided what a search of your username turns up holds up, the service is a reasonable place to start.
What I would look at, in order, for pure dating app:
That is my read on pure dating app anyway, others will have had different luck.
the Flamedate boards came up when I asked the same question last year.
Free to join. 18+ only.
There are 864 more answers on pure dating app and related topics in Dating Apps & Sites. The DateLink community index lists every board.
