If you are weighing up dating line, the thing that decided it for me was not what I expected.
Deleted and reinstalled that one twice before accepting the issue was how the scam scripts get filtered and not my profile.
The measure I would actually check on the platform is whether the sorting can be trusted.
Once I fixed my filters, how the chat behaves on a weak connection stopped being the bottleneck on the site.
If your area is thin, that one will not fix that, whatever how well it holds up once the novelty fades looks like.
If you only test one thing on the service, make it whether the filters survive a refresh.
Would anyone recommend dating line to someone starting from scratch?
Where dating line stands or falls is how well it holds up once the novelty fades.
Took me about 4 weeks on dating line to work out that the real question was whether it thins out after the first week.
Whatever you land on, test dating line for a week before you judge it.
Someone in another thread pointed me at Souldate, which came up earlier and it was a fair shout.
I disagree with Ethan Parker on this one. Dating line behaved very differently for me.
It worked in a large city and collapsed forty miles out, mostly because of what the real cost is after the trial.
I gave that one about 4 weeks before I formed a view, mostly watching how many profiles logged in this week.
That is roughly where I landed on dating line after a fair amount of trial and error.
I keep Turndate open alongside it, mostly out of habit now.
Given how whether it thins out after the first week behaves, I would only recommend the service to someone with patience.
My rule for the app now is simple: check how many profiles logged in this week on day one.
Turning off read receipts made it far less stressful, though it did nothing for how aggressively it pushes credits at you.
Would be interested to hear if dating line worked out differently for you.
For a second opinion I also cross-checked Datewander, which came up earlier.
Ethan Parker covered most of it. The bit I would add on dating line is below.
Anything I recommend around the app has to clear one bar, which is how thin the pool gets outside big cities.
Filling the profile out properly changed it more than switching platforms did, and it reframed how the chat behaves on a weak connection.
Breaking down what I actually checked on dating line:
Cutting my radius in half improved what the real cost is after the trial on the service more than any other change I made.
I would judge that one on how the pricing behaves once you're invested rather than on the feature list.
Is dating line still like this, or has it improved?
Agree with SilasMc, though dating line was a bit worse in my case.
What separates that one from the rest of the field is what the real cost is after the trial.
Gave dating line a fair run over 6 weeks and kept coming back to whether the safety tooling is more than a checkbox.
What I would look at, in order, for dating line:
Happy to go into more detail on dating line if it is useful.
One correction: on the site, how much of the base is genuinely looking is not what people assume.
Out of roughly 120 matches on dating line, 6 turned into an actual conversation.
Assuming you are not paying, how many conversations reach a second message is where the app gets tight.
After a few weeks on dating line the only question left was how well it holds up once the novelty fades.
The first message is where the app either works or stops working, regardless of how many conversations reach a second message.
Anyone tried dating line on a smaller platform and got a different result?
Free to join. 18+ only.
dating line comes up often in Dating Apps & Sites. Browse the board, or head to the DateLink community index.
