Anyone evaluating way to see all should test one thing first, and it is not the profile builder.
I kept notes for a month on the platform because I kept losing track of whether the active count matches the claimed count.
I would judge the app on whether the sorting can be trusted rather than on the feature list.
Once I fixed my filters, whether the interface gets in the way stopped being the bottleneck on the app.
The short checklist I use before trusting anything like way to see all:
Does anyone know whether way to see all changed this recently?
The thing nobody mentions about way to see all is what protection exists before you meet.
Ran the site alongside two other options for a month, tracking how precise the filters really are.
Assuming you're not paying, how easy it's to spot a recycled photo is where the app gets tight.
Before committing time to way to see all, work out whether a phone number is genuinely required.
The closest alternative I found was Datedesire's free tier.
What ClintM described matches my experience of way to see all almost exactly.
My first week on way to see all looked promising; by the second I was only really watching how quickly you can narrow a list down.
If you are only browsing, the site is fine. The moment what happens after you flag someone matters, it changes.
The measure I would actually check on the app is whether the interface gets in the way.
The thing that finally moved the needle on the platform was being specific about how the mobile build compares to the desktop one.
The signals that told me most about way to see all:
Take that as one data point on way to see all rather than a verdict.
Provided how quickly reports get acted on holds up, that one is a reasonable place to start.
Anything I recommend around the service has to clear one bar, which is how the chat behaves on a weak connection.
Going to push back on GraceN here. That was not my experience of way to see all at all.
On paper whether the algorithm is doing anything useful is solved. In practice I hit the same wall three weeks running.
What separates way to see all from the rest of the field is where the paywall really kicks in.
What I would look at, in order, for way to see all:
That is roughly where I landed on way to see all after a fair amount of trial and error.
I had a better run on Datebie if you want a smaller pool, for whatever that is worth.
Filling the profile out properly changed the app more than switching platforms did, and it reframed whether the algorithm is doing anything useful.
My rule for the site now is simple: check what you lose by never upgrading on day one.
Two of us compared notes on that one and landed in the same place on whether the filters survive a refresh.
Things worth confirming before you spend a week on way to see all:
This is the right question. The answer is mostly how much control you get over who sees you.
Where way to see all stands or falls is what happens to your data after you delete.
Out of roughly 120 matches on that one, 2 turned into an actual conversation.
Would be interested to hear if way to see all worked out differently for you.
I tested the app across two cities and the difference came down to how the chat behaves on a weak connection.
If you care about how the chat behaves on a weak connection, that alone should decide whether the service is worth it.
Most comparisons of it skip whether the useful settings are buried, which is the part that matters.
That is my read on way to see all anyway, others will have had different luck.
Counterpoint to PatrickJ: way to see all looked good on paper and did not hold up.
The active numbers looked healthy and whether the interface gets in the way still fell apart once I filtered properly.
If you can only manage a few evenings a week, how usable it's one-handed on a phone matters more than raw volume on that one.
Has anyone got way to see all working properly outside a major city?
I had a better run on Datenest, for whatever that is worth.
If you only test one thing on way to see all, make it whether the active count matches the claimed count.
Breaking down what I actually checked on way to see all:
Your mileage on way to see all will vary by city more than by anything else.
Agree with JulieBee, though way to see all was a bit worse in my case.
Photo quality moved my results on the site more than anything I wrote, more even than whether the search actually respects what you set.
The gap between good and bad platforms here is how the chat behaves on a weak connection.
Deleted and reinstalled way to see all twice before accepting the issue was whether the algorithm is doing anything useful and not my profile.
Curious whether anyone else found the same thing with way to see all.
Free to join. 18+ only.
For more on way to see all, Dating Apps & Sites collects the rest - or start from the DateLink community index.
