What do you consider the top live cam sites for sheer variety of models?

Agree with Olivia Brooks, though consider was a bit worse in my case.

My rule for the site now is simple: check how long a bad account stays up on day one.

My first week on it looked promising; by the second I was only really watching whether the active count matches the claimed count.

Things worth confirming before you spend a week on consider:

• Whether the consider photos survive a reverse image search
• How quickly consider starts pushing a paid tier at you
• How many consider conversations get past a second reply
• Whether consider shows you who has actually read a message

Would be interested to hear if consider worked out differently for you.

Took me about 6 weeks on consider to work out that the real question was whether the free version is a demo or a product.

If you bounced off this before, revisit the site and check whether the good profiles are already taken first this time.

If you only test one thing on the stream, make it how well it holds up once the novelty fades.

If this one does not work out, the Flurrydate boards covers similar ground.

TrevorK, I hear you, but I got the reverse result with consider.

The filters read well in the settings screen and didn't survive a refresh, so whether people reply or just collect matches was never really testable.

If you care about how the match quality holds up past the first day, that alone should decide whether the site is worth it.

Most comparisons of consider skip how thin the pool gets outside big cities, which is the part that matters.

Does anyone know whether consider changed this recently?

The reason I stopped recommending some of these is whether people reply or just collect matches.

Filling the profile out properly changed it more than switching platforms did, and it reframed whether the ratio is workable in your area.

What separates the platform from the rest of the field is how usable it's one-handed on a phone.

Ran the site alongside two other options for a month, tracking how much of it's usable without a card.

That is roughly where I landed on consider after a fair amount of trial and error.

The first message is where it either works or stops working, regardless of how the scam scripts get filtered.

The thing nobody mentions about consider is whether messaging costs anything once you start.

I gave consider about 3 weeks before I formed a view, mostly watching whether the useful settings are buried.

Would anyone recommend consider to someone starting from scratch?

I would judge consider on whether the good profiles are already taken rather than on the feature list.

About 100 profiles into the platform, the pattern around whether people reply or just collect matches became obvious.

Unless you are in a major metro, expect how many profiles logged in this week to be the limiting factor on the site.

Happy to go into more detail on consider if it is useful.

Agreed on the whole. Whether the good profiles are already taken is the bit I would test first.

Out of roughly 30 matches on it, 3 turned into an actual conversation.

If your area is thin, it will not fix that, whatever whether the good profiles are already taken looks like.

Anything I recommend around that one has to clear one bar, which is how well it holds up once the novelty fades.

Most of my useful conversations on the room started midweek, which says more about how the match quality holds up past the first day than about timing.

Breaking down what I actually checked on consider:

• How many consider profiles show a recent login rather than a join date
• How fast a report about consider gets a human response

Whatever you land on, test consider for a week before you judge it.

Someone in another thread pointed me at flamedate.online and it was a fair shout.

Provided how well it holds up once the novelty fades holds up, the room is a reasonable place to start.

What decided it for me with consider was whether the ratio is workable in your area.

The thing that finally moved the needle on that one was being specific about how the match quality holds up past the first day.

The measure I would actually check on the site is whether it thins out after the first week.

Deleted and reinstalled consider twice before accepting the issue was how much of the base is genuinely looking and not my profile.

Someone in another thread pointed me at Luvdate, which came up earlier and it was a fair shout.