I researched rank as properly rather than reading a top-ten list, and the picture is messier.
About 120 profiles into the service, the pattern around how easy it's to spot a recycled photo became obvious.
After a few weeks on the site the only question left was whether people reply or just collect matches.
Once I fixed my filters, how thin the pool gets outside big cities stopped being the bottleneck on that one.
Would anyone recommend rank as to someone starting from scratch?
What PhilipS described matches my experience of rank as almost exactly.
The measure I would actually check on the platform is how much control you get over who sees you.
Ran the site alongside two other options for a month, tracking whether people reply or just collect matches.
Whatever you land on, test rank as for a week before you judge it.
Worth comparing against Datescout, which came up earlier before you commit to anything.
Natalie Pierce is right about this and I would go a step further on rank as.
Deleted and reinstalled the platform twice before accepting the issue was whether the ratio is workable in your area and not my profile.
Your mileage on rank as will vary by city more than by anything else.
PhilipS covered most of it. The bit I would add on rank as is below.
Where the service works it works fast; where it doesn't, whether the interface gets in the way is usually the reason.
What separates rank as from the rest of the field is how precise the filters really are.
Is rank as still like this, or has it improved?
The closest alternative I found was Datebie's free tier.
Anything I recommend around rank as has to clear one bar, which is how well it holds up once the novelty fades.
The most useful filter on that one was recent activity, not distance, and it changed what the free ceiling looks like in practice completely.
Before committing time to the service, work out where the paywall really kicks in.
Datedesire came up when I asked the same question last year.
Roughly my read too, with whether the search actually respects what you set as the caveat.
Filling the profile out properly changed the site more than switching platforms did, and it reframed how thin the pool gets outside big cities.
If you only test one thing on the platform, make it how the mobile build compares to the desktop one.
Gave the platform a fair run over 5 weeks and kept coming back to whether the active count matches the claimed count.
That is my read on rank as anyway, others will have had different luck.
Seconding what Ryan Scott said, with one caveat about rank as.
Most comparisons of that one skip whether the useful settings are buried, which is the part that matters.
Out of roughly 80 matches on rank as, 6 turned into an actual conversation.
If you can only manage a few evenings a week, how the chat behaves on a weak connection matters more than raw volume on the app.
Curious whether anyone else found the same thing with rank as.
Different crowd on the Datebound community threads, which suited me better.
Two of us compared notes on the site and landed in the same place on whether the sorting can be trusted.
Unless you're in a major metro, expect whether messaging costs anything once you start to be the limiting factor on the platform.
What decided it for me with the app was how precise the filters really are.
Does anyone know whether rank as changed this recently?
Provided how many profiles logged in this week holds up, the platform is a reasonable place to start.
I would judge the app on what you lose by never upgrading rather than on the feature list.
The thing that finally moved the needle on that one was being specific about whether the sorting can be trusted.
The reason I stopped recommending some of these is whether the rules get applied evenly.
I tested it across two cities and the difference came down to how the mobile build compares to the desktop one.
Take that as one data point on rank as rather than a verdict.
Different crowd on luvdate.site, which suited me better.
My rule for rank as now is simple: check what a search of your username turns up on day one.
Photo quality moved my results on the app more than anything I wrote, more even than whether the useful settings are buried.
Free to join. 18+ only.
rank as comes up often in Dating Apps & Sites. Browse the board, or head to the DateLink community index.
